The Multi-Channel Architecture of Hadith Criticism: Deconstructing Methodological Heterogeneity and Editorial Agency in the Sunan al-Arba‘ah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62730/syaikhuna.v17i2.7905Kata Kunci:
Sunan al-Arba‘ah, compilation criticism, tarājim al-abwāb, sanad al-kitāb, hadith transmission, source criticism, Islamic legal epistemologyAbstrak
This study re-evaluates the enduring assumption that the Sunan al-Arba‘ah constitute a methodologically monolithic corpus subordinated to the Ṣaḥīḥayn. Grounded in compilation criticism and qualitative comparative text analysis, this investigation examines 48 parallel thematic clusters (192 hadith units) across Kitāb al-Ṭahārah and Kitāb al-Ṣalāh. The analysis reveals four distinct methodological paradigms: Abū Dāwūd’s legal utilitarianism, al-Tirmidhī’s critical pedagogy, al-Nasā’ī’s narrator scrutiny, and Ibn Mājah’s thematic expansion. Compilers operationalized critical judgment through a multi-channel model comprising explicit taxonomy, normative chapter rubrics (tarājim al-abwāb), tacit chain juxtaposition, and regional legal praxis (al-‘amal). Furthermore, manuscript audition certificates (samā‘āt) and recensional divergence empirically decouple codex transmission (sanad al-kitāb) from the evidential authenticity of individual narrations (sanad al-ḥadīth), demonstrating that canonical authority was negotiated through pedagogical utility rather than blanket isnād infallibility. Finally, the study clarifies that these qualitative structural findings provide indispensable taxonomical metadata for future computational network modeling, preventing automated algorithms from misinterpreting classical collections as flat transmitter databases.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abū Dāwūd, S. ibn al-Ash‘ath. (n.d.). Sunan Abī Dāwūd (M. M. ‘Abd al-Ḥamīd, Ed.). Dār al-Fikr.
Abu Samha, A. S. A. (2025). Structural foundations of equity (inṣāf) and equilibrium (i‘tidāl) in hadith criticism: A methodological study. Journal of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, 43(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2025.0420
Al-Issawi, A., & Al-Dulaimi, A. (2025). Al-Bayhaqī’s judgment in al-Sunan al-Kubrā on certain hadiths using the phrase “its isnād (chain) is not strong”: Collection and analysis. Dragoman, 2025(19), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.63132/ati.2025.asampl.7019
Aljoumani, S. (2018). Copies of readers’ certificates in Arabic manuscripts: Why and how? Journal of Islamic Manuscripts, 9(1), 72–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/1878464X-00901003
Almalki, S. H. J. (2023). Quranic reading between the high-level chain of transmission and grammarians' criticism. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 15(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.2023.4264
Al-Nasā’ī, A. ibn Shu‘ayb. (1986). al-Sunan al-Ṣughrā / al-Mujtabā (‘A. F. Abū Ghuddah, Ed.; 8 vols.). Maktab al-Maṭbū‘āt al-Islāmiyyah.
Al-Nasā’ī, A. ibn Shu‘ayb. (n.d.). Sunan al-Nasā’ī (M. N. al-Albānī, Ed.). Maktabat al-Ma‘ārif.
Al-Tirmidhī, M. ibn ‘Īsā. (n.d.). Jāmi‘ al-Tirmidhī (A. M. Shākir, Ed.). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Anam, K., Hartati, Abror, I., & ‘Ubaydi Hasbillah, A. (2025). Beyond al-Jarḥ wa at-Ta‘dīl: A critical study of the narrators accused of lying in Sunan Ibn Mājah. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 26(1), 241–276. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i1.5736
Bilgili, İ., & Karagözoğlu, İ. (2025). Imām Muḥammad’s use of the phrases yanbaghī and lā yanbaghī in al-Muwaṭṭaʾ about taklīfī rulings. Mutefekkir, 12(24), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.30523/mutefekkir.1779986
Brown, J. A. C. (2008). How we know early ḥadīth critics did matn criticism and why it’s so hard to find. Islamic Law and Society, 15(2), 143–184. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851908X290574
Brown, J. A. C. (2011). The canonization of Ibn Mājah: Authenticity vs. utility in the formation of the Sunni ḥadīth canon. Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée, 129, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.4000/remmm.7154
Brown, J. A. C. (2012). The rules of matn criticism: There are no rules. Islamic Law and Society, 19(4), 356–396. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851912X639923
Burge, S. R. (2023). Compilation criticism: Exploring overarching structures in the Six Books. In Hadith Commentary: Continuity and Change (pp. 19–44). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004529083_003
Duderija, A. (2009). A paradigm shift in assessing/evaluating the value and significance of ḥadīth in Islamic thought: From ‘ulūmu-l-isnād/rijāl to ‘usūlu-l-fiqh. Arab Law Quarterly, 23(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1163/157302509X415666
Farooqi, A. M., Malick, R. A. S., Shaikh, M. S., & Akhunzada, A. (2024). Multi-IsnadSet MIS for Sahih Muslim Hadith with chain of narrators, based on multiple ISNAD. Data in Brief, 54, Article 110439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110439
Gökalp, H., & Çetinkaya, A. (2026). Digital humanities and Islamic history research: Methods, projects, and a future-oriented assessment. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, 56, 353–375. https://doi.org/10.26570/isad.1914814
Günaydın, T. (2026). The compilation criticism method in understanding hadith literature and Stephen Burge. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 67(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.1753094
Ibn Mājah, M. ibn Yazīd. (n.d.). Sunan Ibn Mājah (M. F. ‘Abd al-Bāqī, Ed.). Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.
Is, F. (2020). Analisis praktik metode kitab al-Jami' al-Mukhtasar min As-Sunan ar-Rasulillah wa Ma'rifah. SHAHIIH: Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan, 3(2), 1–168.
Ismail, T. M. S. T., Baru, R., Hassan, A. F., Salleh, A. Z. B., & Amin, M. F. M. (2014). The matan and sanad criticisms in evaluating the hadith. Asian Social Science, 10(21), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n21p152
Jamilin, A. K. B., & Yusoff, M. F. B. M. (2020). Revisiting the severe classification of Abū Ḥātim al-Rāzī: An analysis of technical terminology in hadīth transmitter criticism. Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies, 18(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340085
Jaouhari, M. (2021). La transmission d’al-Ǧāmiʿ de Maʿmar Ibn Rāšid (m. 153/770) en al-Andalus et l’apport du manuscrit d’Ankara daté de 364/974. Studia Islamica, 116(1), 151–197. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341439
Jarrar, M. (2024). Sīra and exegesis, Qur'ān 30:1-5: An isnād-cum-matn study. Al-Abhath, 72(1–2), 62–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/2589997X-0072010202
Kara, S. (2024). The integrity of the Qur'an: Sunni and Shi'i historical narratives. Edinburgh University Press.
Korucu Güven, S. (2025). Political discourse and sectarian identity: The transformation process of the concept of Sunna into Ahl al-Sunna. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 29(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.1744283
Masruri, M., Sahimi, M. S., Karim, A., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Asbab al-wurud as an approach to understanding the purpose of hadith (maqasid al-sunnah) in a wasatiyyah and balanced way that is practiced in contemporary society. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(9), Article e06208. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-083
Mghari, M., Bouras, O., & El Hibaoui, A. (2022). Sanadset 650K: Data on hadith narrators. Data in Brief, 44, Article 108540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108540
Motzki, H. (2018). Introduction to isnād-cum-matn methodology. In In Search of Ali Ibn Abi Talib’s Codex: History and Traditions of the Earliest Copy of the Qur’an (pp. 75–94). Gerlach Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4hgk.8
Muhammad Zeki Mahmood Al-Leheabi, S., & Ameen, A. (2026). Certificates of audition (samā‘āt) in Islamic manuscripts: Documentary practices, transmission networks, and historiographical value. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 16(2), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.162.02
Onay, İ. (2021). The importance of mustakhraj works in the context of contribution to ʿulūm al-ḥadīth. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 25(3), 1319–1340. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.988031
Opus, B. (2023). The statement in the hadith as a principle of detection and criticism: It doesn't look like the reporter's narration. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 27(1), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.1234542
Pavlovitch, P. (2022). Inna hādhā ’l-ʿilma dīnun fa-’nẓurū ʿamman taʾkhudhūna-hu: Religion, knowledge of transmitters, and the tyranny of the high isnād. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 52, 211–271.
Qureshi, B. A. (2021). The isnad cum matn analysis of zakat al-fitr traditions: An analysis of Harald Motzki's method. Hamdard Islamicus, 44(4), 59–76.
Ramlee, Y., & Asyraf Rushihi, A. (2026). The role of Qawa’id Syari’ah in resolving the polemics of dirāyah al-ḥadīth. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 16(1), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT072026-15
Razak, N. M. A. M., Nazri, M. A., Majid, L. A., Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2025). Evolution of hadith textual criticism: From classical to contemporary approaches. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, Special Issue 12, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI122025-2
Roiland, M., & Sublet, J. (2017). «Textes flottants»: L’exemple d’Abū Šāma. Une écriture de l’histoire dans le Proche-Orient aux VIIe–IXe/XIIIe–XVe siècles. Der Islam, 94(2), 434–461. https://doi.org/10.1515/islam-2017-0027
Rozikin, M. R. (2026). Al-Farāʾiḍ is half of knowledge: A critical hadith analysis and its juridical implications in Islamic inheritance discourse. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 13(1), Article 2598289. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2598289
Rozmizi, A. H. M., & Ahmad, T. (2026). The evidential authority of al-Rāfi‘ī’s Fatḥ al-’Azīz: A study of selected hadiths classified as ḍa‘īf by Ibn al-Mulaqqin. Jurnal Fiqh, 23(1), 418–449. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol23no1.13
Supriadi, D., Hasbullah, M., & Adam, F. M. (2026). The contribution of Sundanese ulama in maintaining Pegon script as an Islamic intellectual tradition in Indonesia. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 24(1), 173–211. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v24i1.1376
Topgül, M. E., & Maden, Ö. F. (2021). A proposal for a methodology of determining scholarly circles of Ahl al-Ḥadīth: The case of Basra during the first half of the 2nd/8th century. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2021(45), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.26570/isad.846686
Wasman, Mesraini, & Suwendi. (2023). A critical approach to prophetic traditions: Contextual criticism in understanding hadith. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.1-17
Yildiz, O. (2025). Between criticism and defense: The reasons behind the compilation of Abū Ḥanīfa’s Musnads during the 4th century of the Hijra. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 66(2), 691–711. https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.1630603
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Imron Taslim, Rizzaldi Satria, Mohd Asmadi Yakob
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
