Islamic Law View on Standard Education Expenses as Child Support: Case Study of Migrant Families in Klakah, Lumajang Regency

Fathul  Ulum

doi:10.62730/syaikhuna.v14i01.7850

Authors

Fathul Ulum Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Lumajang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62730/syaikhuna.v14i01.7850

Keywords:

Educational costs, child support, Islamic law

Abstract

This study examines the Islamic standard for educational costs as child support for migrant families in Klakah Village, Lumajang Regency. This research approach implemented a qualitative approach with an empirical juridical design. Data were obtained from five informants whose husbands were currently living away from home. Data collection techniques used interviews, observation, and documentation. The results showed that two families were not yet fully aware of their responsibility for providing for their children's education, and three families were still fulfilling their responsibilities to cover their children's education costs. The reason for not meeting educational costs was the family's focus on building a house and paying off debts. Parents recognized the importance of balancing material and religious aspects in child rearing. Keywords: Educational costs, child support, Islamic law

References

Ariany, F., & Ningsih, M. (2023). Pemenuhan Hak Anak Atas Pendidikan Dasar Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Fulfillment of Children ’ s Rights to Basic Education Based on Legal Perspective. Empiricism Journal, 4(1), 175–180.

Aswaruddin. (2021). Terpuruknya Pendidikan Di Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies, 2(1), 36–50.

Damanik, S., & Lubis, R. N. (2024). Designs, Types, and Methods in Qualitative Research. Journal of Educational Science and Teaching, 4(1), 384–388.

Devy, S. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Nafkah Suami Fakir Perspektif Mazhab M?lik? dan Relevansinya dengan Konteks Kekinian. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 3(2).

Eleanora, F. N., & Siswanto, H. (2022). Pemenuhan Hak Atas Pendidikan Bagi Anak Jalanan Dalam Perspektif Kesejahteraan Anak. IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(September), 533–538.

Hajar, H. (2021). NoNafkah Madhiyah Perspektif Imam Empat Mazhab. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(5), 79–96.

Hakim, A. (2022). Analisis Surah Al-Baqarah Ayat 233: Studi Tafsir Ilmi dan Tafsir Tematik Kementerian Agam. Syams?: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 3(January), 26–34.

Kementrian_Agama. (2019). Al-Qur’an al-karim dan terjemahannya. In Percetakan Al Qur’anul Karim King Fahd.

Khoiriya, L. M. (2022). Hak Pendidikan Terhadap Warga Negara Indonesia Berdasarkan Pasal 13 dan Pasal 14 Ekosob. Riau Law Jurnal, 11(2), 340–350.

Kusumalestari, R. R., & Amalia, M. (2023). Parenting styles and digital literacy?: Uncovering their correlation among adolescents. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 11(2), 144–163.

Rustamana, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology (MARCOPOLO), 2(6), 111–128.

Siddiqua, A. (2019). Kritik terhadap Metodologi dan Metode Penelitian dalam Pendidikan. World Journal of Education, 13(4), 16. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n4p16

Sula, A. S., & Utara, S. M. (2022). Implementasi Pemberian Nafkah Bagi Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Desa Falabisahaya ( Perspektif Hukum Islam ). Al-Mizan: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ekonomi, 8(2), 17–31.

Tosoni, S., & Zuccalà, E. (2020). The Research: Methods and Methodology. Palgrave Studies in the History of Subcultures and Popular Music, 7(3), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39811-8_2

Wahyudi, T. S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Perlakuan Tindak Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Dialektika Hukum, 2(1), 57–82.

Wijana, I. N. (2022). Implications of School Dropout for Children ’ s Future in West Nusa Tenggara Indonesia. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 4117–4124. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1946

Williams, D. (2022). Qualitative Research: Essence, Types and Advantages. OALib Open Access Library Journal, 10(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001